Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-20 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1364 HB 160 Amendment No. 1 was again before the House. Representative Brown placed a call of the House on the amendment. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1365 HB 160 Yeas: Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Hoffman, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 26: Delete "accruing" Insert "based on a defect that occurs in the design, planning, supervision, construction, or inspection or observation of construction of an improvement to real property" Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Brown was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1366 HB 160 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Carney, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 1, line 4, through Page 2, line 22: Delete all material. Page 2, line 23: Delete "* Sec. 2." Insert "* Section 1." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. 1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1367 HB 160 Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Nordlund: Page 3, line 18: Delete "gross" Representative Nordlund moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, MacLean, Menard, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, Martin, Moses, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, following line 21: Insert a new paragraph to read: "(4) to public works projects funded by state or local governments." Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Phillips objected. 1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1368 HB 160 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 160 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Brown objected. The question being: "Shall HB 160 be advanced to third reading on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 160 Second Reading Advance to Third Reading YEAS: 25 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1993-04-20 House Journal Page 1369 HB 160 Nays: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Ulmer, Willis And so, lacking the necessary 30 votes, HB 160 failed to advance and will be in third reading on the April 21, 1993, calendar.